Get in with your Stanford address
Join with your @stanford.edu email and your access is ready the moment you do. No invitation to wait for and no code to enter. Sign in with the Google account for that address and start asking.
Everything else works the same for you as for anyone: the same three AIs, the same side-by-side answers, the same chats kept for when you come back.
A question to start with
Use it where one answer is not enough
A proof you are not sure of, a paragraph that does not land, a source you half trust. Ask once and read three answers. When they agree, you have a place to start. When they differ, you have found the part worth thinking about.
Ask a follow-up about the disagreement. It is usually the question a section leader would ask you.
Make it a habit that helps
Bring your own work
Paste the draft, the attempt or the plan. Quartz is at its best with something real to examine.
Read the differences
Three answers that agree are a starting point. Three that differ show you what to check.
Keep the judgment
Decide what to keep, and check it against your source, your rubric or your professor's words.
What it is not
Quartz is not a way around the Honor Code. It does not write your paper or hand in your problem set, and nothing here replaces the reading. Use it the way you would use a study group that argues back: to test your thinking before you commit to it.
A few practical questions
The short ones are here. For anything else, ask below.
Do Stanford students get in right away?
Yes. Join with an @stanford.edu address and your access is ready immediately. You will get one email saying so, then sign in with the Google account for that address.
Is this allowed under the Honor Code?
Using AI depends on each course's policy, and those differ. Check your syllabus or ask your instructor before using any AI tool for graded work. Quartz keeps your chats, so what you asked is always there to show.
Does agreement between AIs mean the answer is correct?
No. Agreement can help you identify a common view, but models can share an error. Check important claims against original evidence. Different answers are a reason to investigate, not a vote you have to follow.